Monday, February 29, 2016

Space Shuttle Capability

Space Shuttle Capability

At one time, 60 percent of public supported shuttle. We flew it once & can get it going again. The USA needs this capability. The X37C per Abbey could get the capability back.

To do this, we must get the attention of Congress, so if you feel strongly, regarding this important capability, please spread the word any way you can--- blog, tweet, etc. Thanks



Sent from my iPad

Sunday, February 28, 2016

Former NASA Flight Director Says A Return To The Moon Is Necessary Before Heading To Mars

WHEN we gave up shuttle, we gave up our role as leader. We need to regain capability.


http://www.ibtimes.com/pulse/former-nasa-flight-director-says-return-moon-necessary-heading-mars-1745722


Sent from my iPad

Truly tragic for AMERICA ! Tweet your people in Congress, let's get it Going!

Shuttle is unique as a system!

"Of course, shuttle is unique as a system; no one can match the capability of the space shuttle."

"Of course, shuttle is unique as a system; no one can match the capability of the space shuttle."

Help get this in media---this is a critical point--winged vehicle vs. Capsule
Don't start a whole new type of architecture that causes you to go back and start flying capsules, which gave up many years ago."
Keep flying shuttle/shuttle concept indefinitely ---George Abbey
BAIKONUR, Kazakhstan (KTRK) -- If the shuttle Discovery launches this month, that will leave just two shuttle launches left before the American space shuttle program comes to an end.

Many space experts say Americans will be shocked next spring when they finally realize that we will have to rely on Russia to get to space for years to come. So what does that mean to the US space program, and those who work for NASA?

Eyewitness News Anchor Tom Koch just returned from Russia and Kazakhstan and got an unprecedented behind-the-scenes look at the future of America's space travel.
We were the first American news crew in 15 years to cover a Russian space launch. We traveled first to Moscow and then to Kazakhstan, where Russia launched astronaut Scott Kelly and two cosmonauts on the Soyuz rocket.
After next spring, the Soyuz will be our only way to get to space, and some space experts think America is making a big mistake.
For nearly 30 years, the shuttles have been America's primary space transportation system. But when the final shuttle is retired next June, the only way for Americans to get into space will be on board the Soyuz rocket.
After nearly three decades of watching the sleek, modern shuttle launch, Americans must get used to the idea that NASA's near-term future will rely on Russia.
It was President George W. Bush who decided six years ago to retire the shuttle fleet next year and build another mode of transportation into space. That was a move Russian space officials told us in an exclusive interview that surprised even them.
"It was a surprise for the overall community, and of course to us," said Alexey Krasnov with the Russian Space Agency. "Of course, shuttle is unique as a system; no one can match the capability of the space shuttle."
The plan was for the US to build another space vehicle, one that could eventually carry Americans to the moon and Mars. But NASA didn't have enough time or money to get it done.
Despite that fact, President Barack Obama and congress have decided not to extend the life of the shuttles until a new spaceship is built.
"I m not sure so many Americans actually know that we're not going to have a human space flight program for a while," shuttle commander Mark Kelly said.
Kelly was there to watch his twin brother, Scott, launch on the Soyuz to the International Space Station. He admits relying on Russia is not an ideal situation but one that's been in the plan for a long time.
"But the good news is we're gonna continue, we're gonna build something new, and we'll be flying again here in hopefully five or six years," Kelly said.
NASA officials point out America has been relying on Russia for years, launching many astronauts on board the Soyuz. And they say America will still lead the International Space Station.
"It's a misnomer to say that we're not a leader in space," said Bill Gerstenmaier, NASA's associate administrator. "We still are leading in space; we're doing it a different way."
"When the shuttle goes away, we're not gonna be the lead on transportation, but we're the lead across the board on many other things," Joel Montablano, NASA's Russia manager, said. "Together we make it happen; no one country can do this."
"I think the United States by giving up the shuttle is making a serious mistake because technologically, it's the most advanced space vehicle in the world, and really there is no reason not to continue to fly it," former Johnson Space Center Director George Abbey said.
In Moscow, Abbey told us NASA should keep flying the shuttle indefinitely and in the meantime build a new space vehicle based on the technology it knows -- winged shuttles. He insists the new rockets that NASA has planned are a step backwards.
"Here we've got really the greatest vehicle in the world, and we are giving it up," Abbey said. "Don't start a whole new type of architecture that causes you to go back and start flying capsules, which gave up many years ago."
Abbey says without the shuttle, NASA has no way to get large cargos into space and that will make it more difficult to operate the space station. And he predicts more big layoffs in Houston and Florida when the shuttle program ends.
"For the United States to be in this situation is poor planning, and it doesn't really exhibit very good vision for the future," Abbey said.
Many space experts say the fault lies with members of congress who are more interested in saving jobs in their districts than funding a long-range, comprehensive plan for America's space future.
Monday on Eyewitness News at 6pm, we will take you inside the Russian space program in both Moscow and Kazakhstan, a place few American reporters have been since the fall of the Soviet Union.

Sent from my iPad

TOTALLY NONSENSICAL decisions re shuttle & ( someday) COTS

Just like many nonsensical decisions by this adm, & bush re space shuttle, what sense does it make to kill shuttle & PAY Russia! They are not even serious about the INFERIOR commercial effort. Look at all the jobs lost across the Nation, the critical capabilities lost. Many of our experts advised this adm as to the proper course of action --- GET a REPLACEMENT before you retire shuttle. One can only conclude , shuttle retirement was a plan to damage the USA. If you look at other actions by this adm that have damaged this country, it makes sense!

Sent from my iPad

DESTRUCTION of Most Fantastic flying machine built by man--- YOU CAN Get it Restarted--- organize & get large numbers tweeting Congress before it is TOO LATE!!!

Look at capabilities we need---- gone
Look at jobs- tens of thousands across nation-----gone
Look at new design/ innovations ------------gone
Look at on orbit capabilities---- gone
Look at billions wasted---------gone
Look at our youths interest in space--- gone
Look at periodic on orbit astronaut operations & capabilities developed--- gone

Our leaders were told by experts to keep shuttle flying!

Outside box leader should re-start this program & improve this amazing vehicle! As summarized by a former Chief Engineer at Kennedy Space Center, "The Orbiter is the most fantastic flying machine built by man. Its retirement in 2010 is premature and shortsighted. What a waste of unique hardware and all the associated infrastructure and people skills that have been developed at Kennedy Space Center. (This applies as well to the other NASA Centers and to the Corporate Suppliers.) The knowledge base and support for complex space launches take a significant time to establish, and now we're planning to dismantle the talented workforce at that site, together with the software and procedures established over 123 flights, to begin a new program. Skills will be lost as we wait!

Sent from my iPad

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Fwd: SpaceX launch aborted in final minutes



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: February 26, 2016 at 11:01:04 AM CST
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: SpaceX launch aborted in final minutes

SpaceX launch scrubs for second time in two days, webcast says

Orlando Sentinel

 

SpaceX webcast says Thursday night launch was scrubbed at last minute

 

Countdown was aborted Thursday at 6:45 p.m., just before a SpaceX launch was scheduled to go up from Cape Canaveral, according to SpaceX's online webcast.

 

It was the second try to launch an SES communications satellite, which was scrubbed shortly before takeoff Wednesday too. Because there was no more time to reload propellant again Thursday, the launch was scrubbed again, and SpaceX gave no time for another attempt at the launch yet.

 

There was no immediate reason provided for the second scrub in two days.

 

At 6:15 p.m., SpaceX had tweeted that propellant was being loaded and the launch was scheduled for 6:47 p.m. from Cape Canaveral. Earlier on Thursday, the launch window was extended out to 8:23 p.m. if necessary.

 

The commercial space company said Wednesday's scrub was "out of an abundance of caution," but that the Falcon 9 rocket "remains healthy." 

 

"Out of an abundance of caution, the team opted to hold launch for today to ensure liquid oxygen temperatures are as cold as possible in an effort to maximize performance of the vehicle."

 

SpaceX has yet to launch this year from Florida's Space Coast.

 

The rocket was supposed to carry an SES satellite into orbit that will help telecommunications and broadcasts in Asia.

 

SES spokeswoman Nita Wright told the Sentinel Wednesday that the crew has remained confident in this launch. 

 

"There is a confidence in the launch because (preparation) is done now," she said. "Now, everything is go, go, go until launch."

 

After launch, SpaceX was going to try to land the first-stage booster on an ocean barge for the first time after three failed attempts. 

 

Industry experts said the landing would cut costs for the company, resulting in a smaller financial threshold for launching payloads into space.

 

"One of the limiting factors to a more-robust space program is the cost of getting payloads into orbit," said Rob Salonen of Florida Institute of Technology. "If SpaceX can make it less expensive to do that, it lowers the cost of that orbit."

 

SES has more than 50 satellites already in orbit and the launch of SES-9 will expand its capacity, company officials said.

 

When SpaceX last tried to land a booster in January, one of its four legs buckled on the barge, resulting in an explosion that CEO Elon Musk posted on his social media accounts.

 

But experts say the variables of a barge landing, including precise location and speed of descent, make it much tougher than doing so on land, which the company has already done.

 

 

 

 

SpaceX launch aborted in final minutes

 

SpaceX kept an upgraded Falcon 9 rocket on the ground Thursday after running into a problem loading super-cold liquid propellants into the launcher's fuel tanks, postponing blastoff of a commercial communications satellite for the second day in a row.

 

The California-based rocket company did not say when the next launch attempt could occur.

 

The Falcon 9 rocket's countdown proceeded normally Thursday until a member of the SpaceX launch team called a hold at approximately T-minus 1 minute, 41 seconds, before the scheduled launch time of 6:47 p.m. EST (2347 GMT).

 

The cause of the last-minute abort was an issue with loading cryogenic liquid oxygen into the rocket, according to a SpaceX official on the official launch webcast. Both stages of the Falcon 9 burn a mixture of RP-1 kerosene fuel and liquid oxygen.

 

SpaceX released no other details on the problem, only tweeting: "Countdown held for the day. Teams are reviewing the data and next available launch date."

 

The Falcon 9 launch team continued to troubleshoot the rocket's fueling system after Thursday evening's scrub to identify the problem and develop a fix.

 

The SES 9 communications satellite fastened atop the 229-foot-tall launcher has been delayed more than six months after a Falcon 9 failure last year grounded SpaceX's workhorse fleet.

 

Engineers called off a launch attempt Wednesday less than an hour before liftoff to allow the Falcon 9's liquid oxygen supply to cool off to the desired temperature, a requirement for the latest iteration of SpaceX's rocket.

 

The first flight of the upgraded launcher in December carried 11 small communications satellites into orbit, and SES 9's flight marks the second launch of the new rocket model.

 

Designed to loft heavier cargo into space, the upgraded Falcon 9 burns a super-chilled mixture of RP-1 and liquid oxygen.

 

The modified Falcon 9 consumes a super-chilled propellant mix that allows engineers to load additional fuel into the rocket. The cryogenic liquid oxygen is chilled closer to its freezing point, from minus 298 degrees Fahrenheit to minus 340 degrees, while the Falcon 9's RP-1 fuel — a refined form of kerosene — is cooled from a standard room temperature of about 70 degrees Fahrenheit to 20 degrees, according to Elon Musk, SpaceX's founder and CEO.

 

The change essentially allows engineers to load more propellant mass into the the volume of the Falcon 9 fuel tanks, which are also slightly enlarged on the upgraded rocket. The denser fuel mix flows faster into the rocket's Merlin engines, adding extra thrust to haul heavier satellites into orbit and leaving leftover fuel to attempt landings of the booster for future reuse.

 

The first stage's nine Merlin 1D engines collectively generate 1.5 million pounds of thrust at sea level, up from 1.3 million force-pounds on the earlier version of the Falcon 9. All told, the changes allow the Falcon 9 to deliver about 30 percent more mass to orbit without extra thrust from strap-on boosters or other major additions to the booster, according to SpaceX.

 

The upgrades also allow SpaceX to recover the first stage of the Falcon 9 on more launches, a capability previously limited by the type of mission it performed.

 

SpaceX engineers struggled to master the handling of the super-cold densified propellants at the Falcon 9 launch pad before the maiden flight of the upgraded rocket in December, but the rocket successfully took off the first time it received propellants on a real launch attempt.

 

The launch team updated the Falcon 9's countdown procedures to account for the sensitivity of the super-chilled propellants.

 

Instead of loading the propellants three hours before liftoff, the upgraded Falcon 9 receives its fuel in the final 30 minutes of the countdown to minimize the time the cryogenic liquid sits inside the rocket tanks and warms up in the mild ambient temperatures of Florida's Space Coast.

 

 

 

Cernan 's comments to House on HSF

http://marklarson.com/genecernan/House_Hearing_Statement.pdf

Friday, February 26, 2016

One can not Imagine Killing the "Greatest Vehicle ever BUILT". Re KSC Chief Eng!

Look at capabilities we need---- gone
Look at jobs- tens of thousands across nation-----gone
Look at new design/ innovations ------------gone
Look at on orbit capabilities---- gone
Look at billions wasted---------gone
Look at our youths interest in space--- gone
Look at periodic on orbit astronaut operations & capabilities developed--- gone

Our leaders were told by experts to keep shuttle flying!

Outside box leader should re-start this program & improve this amazing vehicle!

Thursday, February 25, 2016

Proper Approach to USA manned spaceflight program!

The most obvious way to control the risks associated with current NASA planning is to retain the Space Shuttle capability in some form until there is demonstrated American provided capability to transport humans and cargo to and from the ISS. Retention of the Space Shuttle would provide all of the capability to protect the integrity of the Space Station and its science programs. The issue as always is cost; however, the cost model could be significantly moderated by commercializing the Space Shuttle Program. Estimates are that a commercial venture could operate the Space Shuttle for a couple flights per year at perhaps 1/3 of its current cost. The critical skills are still available at this time. This would enable America to continue the same capability to support the ISS, and even conduct other priority earth orbit missions such as American controlled human access to space to support a critical unforeseen national security need.

By establishing commercialized Space Shuttle operations, NASA can take a known and reliable flight system and use it to develop and transition the governance and oversight processes needed for the COTS era operations. In addition to mitigating the risks and uncertainties associated with current NASA plans, America would retain its prominence as a leading participant in human space flight. A professionally done peer reviewed risk assessment will define the risks with their associated uncertainties and highlight where mitigations must be taken. To do otherwise places reliance on hope over experience.

Cernan 's view on manned spaceflight in 2010

http://marklarson.com/genecernan/House_Hearing_Statement.pdf

Cernan laments lack of interest in exploration-- I lament inability to maintain long term EO operational Capabilities!

This is a big , dangerous issue, maintenance of capabilities in EO to protect the USA from our enemies!!!

Having a crash effort to "get going" what we should have been maintaining is very Dangerous!

Last man on the moon laments lack of U.S. interest in space exploration | The Seattle Times

http://www.seattletimes.com/entertainment/movies/last-man-on-the-moon-laments-lack-of-us-interest-in-space-exploration/


Sent from my iPad

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

We are going to have to Reverse many O decisions--- the Shuttle is one of them!

We built it, We put in museum, We can Take it out of museum!!

And we can improve it. Re nasaproblems.com.

That is what we should do, IF we only had leaders who could think outside the box!

WE are going to have to Reverse many O decisions---- THIS is one of them


Re Page section of this blog.

Shuttle in museum is CRAZY---- GET IT OUT--- write you senators & reps everyday!!!!

This unique & capable system is the greatest vehicle ever built ( KSC chief engineer).

Re the case to save shuttle, Thompson talk at baker institute, lost in space-- Abbey .

People, please get mad & raise hell !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Get a blog, & encourage your friends to do likewise to spread word about the destruction of the shuttle that AMERICA must have to control space!

The case to save the shuttle by Al Richardson

You should read this carefully. This capability is what we threw in trash after spending many billions.

We should spend the money & get this vehicle operational-- we still have a lot of remaining parts & systems.

The security of the USA is in danger!

Monday, February 22, 2016

You better get our inadequate space capabilities FIXED-- your Progeny's Survival depends on It!

Look at what can be done from space. Consider the present program plans of most of the major Nations on Earth!

The liberals are anti a strong AMERICA , they want us to be governed by the UN , which would be a disaster!

If you want AMERICA to remain as it has been, better get busy, otherwise a disaster is coming!

You better give the status of our space/ military Some SERIOUS thought!

This country is in trouble. Our leadership has let our capabilities in space & military in general decline to such a degree that this country is in serious danger!!

Compare what we had in 2008 & NOW!!!

Better tweet your reps before it is too late!

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Fwd: Virgin Galactic unveils second SpaceShipTwo - SpaceNews.com



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: February 21, 2016 at 9:41:50 AM CST
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: Virgin Galactic unveils second SpaceShipTwo - SpaceNews.com

 

http://spacenews.com/wp-content/themes/spacenews/assets/img/logo.png

 

 

ss2 rollout bransonVirgin Galactic founder Sir Richard Branson stands in the sunroof of an SUV that towed the new SpaceShipTwo into view during a Feb. 19 ceremony in Mojave, California. Credit: SpaceNews photo by Jeff Foust

MOJAVE, Calif. — Virgin Galactic rolled out its second SpaceShipTwo suborbital spaceplane Feb. 19 as the company seeks to rebound from a fatal test flight accident more than a year ago.

In a ceremony at Virgin Galactic's Final Assembly, Integration and Test Hangar here attended by a mix of dignitaries, celebrities and some of its several hundred customers, the company showed off a vehicle that the company billed as a symbol as its determination to recover from the October 2014 loss of the first SpaceShipOne during a test flight.

"One of reasons that we're so proud of the spaceship we will shortly present to you is that it is the product not just of skill and determination, but of a willingness to learn and a commitment to continually improve," George Whitesides, Virgin Galactic chief executive, said at the event.

The event had much of the pomp and circumstance of many Virgin events. The company towed the new SpaceShipTwo into the center of the hangar using an SUV, with company founder Sir Richard Branson standing in the vehicle's sunroof. Later, he called upon his one-year-old granddaughter to christen the spacecraft using bottle of milk.

ss2 crowdsCrowds gather around the second SpaceShipTwo after the rollout ceremony. Credit: SpaceNews photo by Jeff Foust

The vehicle is very similar to the first SpaceShipTwo with only a few noticeable differences, such as larger horizontal stabilizers on the vehicle's twin tail booms and changes to its paint scheme. Company officials, though, said the vehicle incorporates other changes from both the earlier testing and development of SpaceShipTwo and the accident.

"It's an evolutionary change," said Mike Moses, senior vice president for operations at Virgin Galactic, in a briefing prior to the rollout. That includes changes learned from the development and early flight tests of the first SpaceShipTwo, such as changes to the structure and routing of wiring within the vehicle. "There's nothing really sexy or exciting about those changes. That's just the evolution of the design."

Other changes, though, direct address the Oct. 31, 2014, accident, which was caused when co-pilot Michael Alsbury prematurely unlocked the feathering mechanism that raises the vehicle's tail, causing an aerodynamic instability that broke the vehicle apart. A control system will physically lock the feathering lever in place when it is unsafe to engage the feathering system.

Moses added that there are other, unspecified changes to the vehicle as a result of the accident. "We used the lens of that accident to look at everything else we do, in manufacturing, in ground processing, in servicing the vehicle and in flying the vehicle," he said. "We looked at systems way beyond what the scope of the accident investigation asked us to look at."

The rollout marks the beginning of the vehicle's test program, although company officials said it will be some time before this SpaceShipTwo takes to the sky. Moses said there will be a series of ground tests of various vehicle systems, followed by taxi tests on the runway at the Mojave Air and Space Port. That will be followed by "captive carry" flights, where SpaceShipTwo remains attached to its WhiteKnightTwo carrier aircraft, glide flights, and finally powered flights.

Company officials stubbornly refused to provide a detailed schedule for those test flights, including when the vehicle might be ready, even in a best-case scenario, to begin commercial service. "As soon as we tell you guys a date, we starting being held to one, and that's why we don't want the team being held that pressure," Moses said.

Whitesides, though, said he expected many parts of the fight test program to run more quickly than for the first SpaceShipTwo, given the experience from that test program. "We just need to know that the vehicle we have is performing the same way as the last one did," he said.

Virgin officials also said that they have made progress on the vehicle's hybrid propulsion system since the accident, an effort that had suffered years of delays and changes in technical design during SpaceShipTwo's overall development. "That was always the long pole in the tent for [SpaceShipTwo] serial number one, by years," said Doug Shane, president of The Spaceship Company, the Virgin subsidiary responsible for building SpaceShipTwo.

whitesidesVirgin Galactic CEO George Whitesides said he expected the test schedule for the second SpaceShipTwo would go faster than the first, but would not give a specific timetable for flights. Credit: SpaceNews photo by Jeff Foust

Shane said the company has settled on a rubber-based solid fuel called hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), after testing both that and a polyamide fuel similar to nylon over the years. An internal company team has made "phenomenal progress" on the motor, he said, and the company is close to qualifying the motor for flight. "We'll enter this flight test program with a rocket motor system that we'll know will work, which really hobbled the serial number one flight testing program."

Virgin Galactic also used the rollout to briefly reflect on the earlier accident. "With the great sense of achievement and excitement, there is also a sense of poignancy," Whitesides said.

Shane, who noted at the rollout he had been involved with SpaceShipTwo and its predecessor SpaceShipOne at Scaled Composites since 1999, also noted the loss of Alsbury, who was killed in the accident. "I know he believed in this mission, and in this technology, and in this vehicle design," he said of Alsbury. "And we've made this a better and safer system because making a better and safer system was what Mike was all about."

 

 © 2016 SpaceNews, Inc. All rights reserved. 

 


 

Absolute Superior Control of Space!

The USA needs absolute superior control of space for our survival. Presently our capabilities are declining with no plans to regain shuttle or Apollo like capabilities. The X37C needs to go forward re Boeing proposal. Space capabilities are part of our overall military capability which must be absolutely superior PERIOD. We need both shuttle & moon base capabilities plus the proposed but never implemented Shuttle Heavy Lift capability.


USA Survival depends on Absolute Superior Space Capabilities-!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

. control of space critical to USA! our capabilities are declining with no plans to regain shuttle capabilities!

Sent from my iPad

Do you understand what this vehicle is capable of?? No replacement in sight!

DO YOU want another country to control the USA ? Control of Space is serious business--- Our capability is declining!!!

Seems people would easily UNDERSTAND this--- rather easy to understand!

The ultimate Control of Earth depends on control of space.

Do you want another country to control the USA ?

All USA citizens better tweet their congressional reps. & all potus candidates!

Saturday, February 20, 2016

We should Get them back in Service!!!!

REAL Space Act of 2013 Thank you Bobby for posting this

This does not seem to be a good time to throw away three functioning Shuttle orbiters, thereby discarding a working national space faring capability, one carefully built and paid for over the last 50 years
On February 15, 2011 a symposium entitled "U.S. Human Spaceflight: Continuity and Stability" was held at Rice University's James A. Baker Institute of Public Policy. Organized by George Abbey, the resident space expert at the Baker Institute, one might have suspected that it would be Shuttle-centric and indeed, it was. Many pertinent points relevant to the current discussion about NASA's human space program and its future (or lack thereof) came out of the presentations at this symposium.
The program featured several speakers, all of whom played major roles in the Shuttle program. I found comments by Robert F. "Bob" Thompson most interesting. Bob Thompson is one of the true "old guard" – an original member of Bob Gilruth's Space Task Group at NASA Langley, a group pre-dating the Mercury Program. Thompson was head of the Apollo Applications Program (Skylab) and the first manager of the Space Shuttle program. Many of his remarks resonate strongly with points I have made here and elsewhere about serious problems being dismissed or ignored in the unseemly rush to re-vamp NASA from an operational space flight agency into a check-writing bureaucracy for New Space endeavors.
Thompson's theme was a considered and educated look at what discarding the country's Space Shuttle Program means. Both his talk and the talk by Howard DeCastro (Shuttle Program Manager at the United Space Alliance, which operates the Shuttle system for NASA) carefully outlined the history of the Shuttle program and the possibility of flying the Shuttle commercially until a new system becomes available, thereby retaining our national spaceflight capability. They covered the many compromises made both in Shuttle's conception and in its execution, as well as its unique capabilities. The Shuttle can both deliver and retrieve payloads from space; it is a fully integrated transport and servicing system in low Earth orbit. The famous Hubble Space Telescope would be a useless piece of junk instead of a national treasure without the Shuttle missions that first allowed for the repair of its defective vision and then returned to service the instrument in space multiple times over the ensuing decade.
An often ignored but critically important issue is the supporting infrastructure for spaceflight. Thompson made the analogy that when people see a Shuttle Orbiter, they really are seeing just the "tip of an iceberg." The Shuttle is more than an orbiter vehicle; it is also the servicing facilities at the Cape that process and prepare the orbiter for launch. It is the ET fabrication facilities at Michoud and the SRB plant at Promontory as well as the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) that has performed flawlessly over the 133 flights to date. It is the mobile crawler and the launch towers at Pad 39-A. And it is the trained cadre of people that put all the pieces together and make them work in concert to deliver and return people and equipment from space. Thompson rhetorically encompassed his argument thusly: The Shuttle is a "dumb vehicle that cost too much" but is a "fully functional part of a space transportation system – an 18-wheel, extended cab work vehicle." He told the audience that Orion, Soyuz and Progress were more like "taxis" and "pickup trucks." He said that the Constellation vehicles (chosen to implement the 2004 Vision) were bad decisions, followed on now by an even worse decision.
Thompson used a familiar graphic, the chart showing NASA's fraction of the annual federal budget over decades (see above). The large spike centered around 1966 represents peak spending for the Apollo program. Thompson made two specific observations about this graph. First, Richard Nixon (who took office in 1969) is often damned as the President who "killed Apollo." But the graph shows that the ramp-down in spending for Apollo began two years earlier in 1967, in Lyndon Johnson's administration. The Vietnam War required some of NASA's money, so Apollo-Saturn production managers were told to build the equipment needed to fulfill Kennedy's decadal goal and shut down thereafter.
Additionally, Thompson made the very significant point (one usually ignored by many engaged in space policy debates) that the "Apollo spike" paid for the infrastructure – the buildings, laboratories, test and training facilities, and launch systems – that Apollo used and that the Shuttle uses to this day. By terminating the Shuttle with no follow-on, the fate of most of this infrastructure is the scrap heap. Note that the "Apollo spike" in funding happened forty years ago. To design and build the supporting infrastructure for human spaceflight in the mid-1960s, we annually spent ten times the fraction of the budget that we do now. Given the reality of the nation's finances, NASA will be lucky if they can continue to get one-half of one percent of federal spending per year. This does not seem to be a good time to throw away three functioning Shuttle orbiters, thereby discarding a working national space faring capability, one carefully built and paid for over the last 50 years.
Several New Space companies are working on vehicle designs, which, if successful in creating a replacement space "work vehicle," will need their own supporting infrastructure. These efforts will necessitate creating all the facilities mentioned above for their vehicles and systems. The cost of any given single launch is rolled into one number, but it must cover a multitude of expenses. Amortized over many decades, they may eventually pay for it all, but only if they can get enough business to fly their vehicles regularly and often. With NASA as their principal customer, will enough flights be purchased to take these New Space companies to the level they need in order to make a profit and survive?
Finally, Thompson asked, what is exploration if not living and working in space and contributing to the economy? He understands that exploration is more than going somewhere and planting a flag or collecting some rocks. Each time NASA launches a Shuttle, it puts 100 tons in space. By replacing the orbiter body with a cargo faring, we are creating a heavy lift launch vehicle. This Shuttle side-mount launch vehicle is something that fits the requirements placed on NASA for a new heavy lift vehicle. Its reliability has been consistently improved over the course of more than 30 years of flight experience and is more than adequate for many different kinds of missions throughout cislunar space. This is where the focus of our space program ought to be – and a zone of space specifically mentioned in the new agency authorization.
Preserving, adapting and using what we already have is smarter than destroying capability and starting again from scratch. We are putting faith in the emergence of space systems that will do what we want, when and where we want. We are told that to nurture and foster other providers of space access, we must throw away the bird in our hand and plant a revolutionary new bush, hopeful that it will grow and attract a variety of new birds. I leave it to you to decide the wisdom of such a restrictive course. Plant the bush but don't throw away the only bird we now hold. We must be fully conscious about the realities of non-existent systems and preserve the space transportation capability on which America can rely.


Sent from my iPad

LOOK at money we are sending to muslims! BUT NO MANNED Space prog!

Do a google search on this-- money to govs, mosques, refugees, UN, & on & on.

The republican house is funding.
But, WE CANT have a manned space program.

Sent from my iPad

Hell of a MESS--NO Shuttle, NO Manned Capability, NONE on the way-- & WE pay Russia!

And there does not seem to be much concern in the general public!

Inexplicable to me. If you know of pro shuttle blogs, email info to me. Email on blog.

Friday, February 19, 2016

U.S. Space Programs: Investment Strategy for National Security Space

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/02/an-investment-strategy-for-national-security-space


Sent from my iPad

Fwd: NASA Technologies We Use Every Day



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: Kent Castle <kent.d.castle@hotmail.com>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 4:24:45 PM CST
To: Reason Marilou <loganlou55@yahoo.com>, Bogan Carole <bcbogan@earthlink.net>, Choban Peter <peter.s.choban@aero.org>, Patterson James <w8ljz@aol.com>, Madsen Ron <ronstar@pdq.net>, Martin Bobby <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>
Subject: FW: NASA Technologies We Use Every Day


 

From:
To: ;
Subject: NASA Technologies We Use Every Day
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:14:34 -0600

6 NASA Technologies We Use Every Day

02/17/2016 11:04 am ET | Updated 6 hours ago
  • ThrillistEverything worth caring about in food, drink, and travel

By: Joe McGauley
@jwmcgauley

2016-02-17-1455724094-2431515-main.jpg
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/NASA

The Apollo missions were not only impressive for the fact that, you know, we succeeded in putting a man on the moon, but also because the push to reach it kickstarted a prolific era of innovation. It hasn't yet come to a halt as we continue to reap the benefits of the groundbreaking technology and advanced materials necessary for man's most audacious endeavors.

To put things into perspective, we've rounded up 11 everyday items that were originally developed by NASA and its allies to help us explore the great beyond. Chances are, you've used one or more of these in the last week. Let the games begin.

2016-02-17-1455724193-2473047-1.jpg
Credit: Flickr/John McStravick

Better sunglasses
Ever wonder how it is that your five-year-old Ray-Bans haven't been scratched to all hell, considering what you've put them through? Thank big brother NASA, who in their never-ending quest for defense against the ravages of our atmosphere and beyond, developed a technique called "direct ion deposition" that creates a thin, ultra-protective layer of diamond-like carbon. So that the ground-bound can also take advantage of the science, the masterful technique
has now been licensed out to sunglasses companies.

2016-02-17-1455724283-521768-2.jpg
Credit: Youtube/Medical and Dental

Nice teeth
To prompt solar panels on satellites to deploy outward once in orbit, NASA built them using a durable metal alloy known as
nitinol, which is defined by its ability to spring back to shape -- after bending -- once warmed up. These days, orthodontists regularly use braces with nitinol wire to ensure they hold their shape in the intense warmth of patients' mouths.

2016-02-17-1455724350-2173801-3.jpg
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/Johan

Memory foam
Your outrageously comfortable "viscoelastic polyurethane foam" slumber pod exists solely because NASA needed a way to keep astronauts from bouncing around like crash-test dummies while strapped into the return capsules and shuttles.

2016-02-17-1455724569-1826646-4.jpg
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/NASA

Freeze-dried food
That novelty astronaut ice cream you just had to buy on a field trip to the science museum? Yeah, that was actually a pretty big deal. Since it was crucial to keep a mission's weight down, NASA
devised a way to keep the astronauts stocked with food via freeze-dried meals, which retain 98% of their original nutritional value and only 20% of their original weight. Think about that next time you pour a bowl of Lucky Charms.

2016-02-17-1455724667-3546978-5.jpg
Credit: Flickr/Oregon State University

Microchips
The fact that there are computers small enough to fit in our pockets is a testament to the circuitry developed for the Apollo missions' complex onboard navigation systems. The microchip as we know it today evolved out of the first working integrated circuit, which Texas Instruments developed specifically for the Department of Defense and NASA. Now you know who to blame for your crippling Candy Crush addiction.

2016-02-17-1455724728-6725238-6.jpg
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/NASA

Cordless tools
Your freedom to hang shelving and, frankly, anything you damn well please in the middle of nowhere is due in no small part to the advancements
made by Black & Decker in the early '60s at the behest of NASA. They needed tools that astronauts could easily use to obtain samples of moon rock and soil, so the B&D team came up with a then-revolutionary set of battery-powered drills and vacuums.

To find out what other surprising items were developed by NASA, get the full story at Thrillist.com!

China's Racing to Space. Is It a Military Ploy? - NBC News

Better hope USA dominance is NOT behind us!!!!!!bm



http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innovation/china-s-racing-space-it-military-ploy-n520916


Sent from my iPad

Fwd: Obama Administration Proposes Smaller 2017 NASA Budget of $19 Billion with Big Exploration Cuts



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Robert Hooi" <rwlh21@sbcglobal.net>
Date: February 18, 2016 at 11:22:43 PM CST
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;>
Subject: Obama Administration Proposes Smaller 2017 NASA Budget of $19 Billion with Big Exploration Cuts
Reply-To: "Robert Hooi" <rwlh21@sbcglobal.net>

Obama Administration Proposes Smaller 2017 NASA Budget of $19 Billion with Big Exploration Cuts

12 Feb , 2016 by

NASA releases budget request for Fiscal Year 2017. Credit: NASA

NASA releases budget request for Fiscal Year 2017. Credit: NASA

The Obama Administration has announced its new Federal budget and is proposing to cut NASA's Fiscal Year 2017 Budget to $19 billion by carving away significant funding for deep space exploration, whereas the overall US Federal budget actually increases to over $4.1 trillion.

This 2017 budget request amounts to almost $300 million less than the recently enacted NASA budget for 2016 and specifically stipulates deep funding cuts for deep space exploration programs involving both humans and robots, during President Obama's final year in office.

The 2017 budget proposal would slash funding to the very programs designed to expand the frontiers of human knowledge and aimed at propelling humans outward to the Red Planet and robots to a Jovian moon that might be conducive to the formation of life.

Absent sufficient and reliable funding to keep NASA's exploration endeavors on track, further launch delays are almost certainly inevitable – thereby fraying American leadership in space and science.

The administration is specifying big funding cuts to the ongoing development of NASA's mammoth Space Launch System (SLS) heavy lift rocket and the state of the art Orion deep space crew capsule. They are the essential first ingredients to carry out NASA's ambitious plans to send astronauts on deep space 'Journey to Mars' expeditions during the 2030s.

The overall Exploration Systems Development account for human deep space missions would be slashed about 18 percent from the 2016 funding level; from $4.0 Billion to only $3.3 Billion, or nearly $700 million.

SLS alone is reduced the most by $700 million from $2.0 billion to $1,31 billion, or a whopping 35 percent loss. Orion is reduced from $1.27 billion to $1.12 billion for a loss of some $150 million.

Make no mistake. These programs are already starved for funding and the Obama administration tried to force similar cuts to these programs in 2016, until Congress intervened.

Likewise, the Obama administration is proposing a draconian cut to the proposed robotic mission to Jupiter's moon Europa that would surely delay the launch by at least another half a decade or more – to the late 2020s.

The Europa mission budget proposal is cut to only $49 million and the launch is postponed until the late 2020s. The mission received $175 million in funding in 2016 – amounting to a 72 percent reduction.

Furthermore there is no funding for a proposed lander and the launch vehicle changes from SLS to a far less powerful EELV – causing a year's long increased travel time.

In order to maintain an SLS launch in approximately 2022, NASA would require a budget of about $150 million in 2017, said David Radzanowski, NASA's chief financial officer, during a Feb. 9 teleconference with reporters.

Why is Europa worth exploring? Because Europa likely possesses a subsurface ocean of water and is a prime target in the search for life!

Overall, NASA's hugely successful Planetary Sciences division suffers a huge and nearly 10 percent cut of $141 million to $1.51 billion – despite undeniably groundbreaking scientific successes this past year at Pluto, Ceres, Mars and more!

Altogether NASA would receive $19.025 billion in FY 2017. This totals $260 million less than the $19.285 billion appropriated in FY 2016, and thus corresponds to a reduction of 1.5 percent.

By contrast, the overall US Federal Budget will increase nearly 5 percent to approximately $4.1 trillion. Simple math demonstrates that NASA is clearly not a high priority for the administration. NASA's share of the Federal budget comes in at less than half a cent on the dollar.

Orion crew module pressure vessel for NASA's Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1) is unveiled for the first time on Feb. 3, 2016 after arrival at the agency's Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida. It is secured for processing in a test stand called the birdcage in the high bay inside the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout (O&C) Building at KSC. Launch to the Moon is slated in 2018 atop the SLS rocket.  Credit: Ken Kremer/kenkremer.com

Orion crew module pressure vessel for NASA's Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1) is unveiled for the first time on Feb. 3, 2016 after arrival at the agency's Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida. It is secured for processing in a test stand called the birdcage in the high bay inside the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout (O&C) Building at KSC. Launch to the Moon is slated in 2018 atop the SLS rocket. Credit: Ken Kremer/kenkremer.com

NASA's Fiscal Year 2017 budget proposal was announced by NASA Administrator Charles Bolden during a televised 'State of NASA' address at the agency's Langley Research Center in Virginia on Feb. 9.

Bolden did not dwell at all on the significant funding reductions for exploration.

"We are hitting our benchmarks with new exploration systems like the Space Launch System rocket and the Orion Crew Vehicle. A new consensus is emerging in the scientific and policy communities around our vision, timetable and plan for sending American astronauts to Mars in the 2030s."

And he outlined some milestones ahead.

"We'll continue to make great progress on the Space Launch System – SLS–rocket and we're preparing for a second series of engine tests," said Bolden.

"At the Kennedy Space Center, our teams will outfit Orion's crew module with the spacecraft's heat-shielding thermal protection systems, avionics and subsystems like electrical power storage, cabin pressure control and flight software –to name just a few."

NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) blasts off from launch pad 39B at the Kennedy Space Center in this artist rendering showing a view of the liftoff of the Block 1 70-metric-ton (77-ton) crew vehicle configuration.   Credit: NASA/MSFC

NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) blasts off from launch pad 39B at the Kennedy Space Center in this artist rendering showing a view of the liftoff of the Block 1 70-metric-ton (77-ton) crew vehicle configuration. Credit: NASA/MSFC

NASA plans to launch the first combined SLS/Orion on the uncrewed Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1) in November 2018.

Indeed the Orion EM-1 pressure vessel just arrived at the Kennedy Space Center last week to completely install all the systems required for flight.

NASA's Orion EM-1 crew module pressure vessel arrived at the Kennedy Space Center's Shuttle Landing Facility tucked inside NASA's Super Guppy aircraft on Feb 1, 2016. The Super Guppy opens its hinged nose to unload cargo.  Credit: Ken Kremer/kenkremer.com

NASA's Orion EM-1 crew module pressure vessel arrived at the Kennedy Space Center's Shuttle Landing Facility tucked inside NASA's Super Guppy aircraft on Feb 1, 2016. The Super Guppy opens its hinged nose to unload cargo. Credit: Ken Kremer/kenkremer.com

The launch date for the first crewed flight on EM-2 was targeted for 2021. But EM-2 is likely to slip to the right to 2023, due to insufficient funding.

Lack of funding will also force NASA to delay development of the far more capable and powerful Exploration Upper Stage (EUS) to propel Orion on deep space missions. It will now not be available for the SLS/EM-2 launch as hoped.

The proposed huge budget cuts to SLS, Orion and Europa are certain to arose the ire of multiple members of Congress and space interest groups, who just successfully fought to increase NASA's FY 2016 budget for these same programs in the recently passed 2016 omnibus spending bill.

"This administration cannot continue to tout plans to send astronauts to Mars while strangling the programs that will take us there," said Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), Chairman of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, in a statement in response to the president's budget proposal.

"President Obama's FY17 budget proposal shrinks our deep space exploration programs by more than $800 million. And the administration once more proposes cuts of more than $100 million to the Planetary Science accounts, which have previously funded missions like this past year's Pluto flyby."

 

"This imbalanced proposal continues to tie our astronauts' feet to the ground and makes a Mars mission all but impossible. This is not the proposal of an administration that is serious about maintaining America's leadership in space."

A "true color" image of the surface of Jupiter's moon Europa as seen by the Galileo spacecraft. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute

A "true color" image of the surface of Jupiter's moon Europa as seen by the Galileo spacecraft. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute

"The Coalition for Deep Space Exploration … had hoped the request would reflect the priorities laid out for NASA in the FY16 Omnibus, for which there was broad support," said Mary Lynne Dittmar, executive director of the Coalition for Deep Space Exploration, in a statement.

"Unfortunately this was not the case. The Coalition is disappointed with the proposed reduction in funding below the FY16 Omnibus for NASA's exploration programs. We are deeply concerned about the Administration's proposed cut to NASA's human exploration development programs."

"This proposed budget falls well short of the investment needed to support NASA's exploration missions, and would have detrimental impacts on cornerstone, game-changing programs such as the super-heavy lift rocket, the Space Launch System (SLS), and the Orion spacecraft – the first spacecraft designed to reach multiple destinations in the human exploration of deep space."

Homecoming view of NASA's first Orion spacecraft after returning to NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Dec. 19, 2014 after successful blastoff on Dec. 5, 2014.  Credit: Ken Kremer - kenkremer.com

Homecoming view of NASA's first Orion spacecraft after returning to NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Dec. 19, 2014 after successful blastoff on Dec. 5, 2014. Credit: Ken Kremer – kenkremer.com

Funding for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) was maintained at planned levels to keep it on track for launch in 2018.

All 18 primary mirrors of NASA's James Webb Space Telescope are seen fully installed on the backplane structure by technicians using a robotic arm (center) inside the massive clean room at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.  Credit: Ken Kremer/kenkremer.com

All 18 primary mirrors of NASA's James Webb Space Telescope are seen fully installed on the backplane structure by technicians using a robotic arm (center) inside the massive clean room at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. Credit: Ken Kremer/kenkremer.com

On Dec. 18, 2015, the US Congress passed and the president signed the 2016 omnibus spending bill which funds the US government through the remainder of the 2016 Fiscal Year.

As part of the omnibus bill, NASA's approved budget amounted to nearly $19.3 Billion. That was an outstanding result and a remarkable turnaround to some long awaited good news from the decidedly negative outlook earlier in 2015.

The 2016 budget represented an increase of some $750 million above the Obama Administration's proposed NASA budget allocation of $18.5 Billion for Fiscal Year 2016, and an increase of more than $1.2 Billion over the enacted budget for FY 2015.

Under the proposed NASA budget for Fiscal Year 2017, the fictional exploits of 'The Martian' will never become reality.

And the hunt for extraterrestrial life on the icy moons of the outer solar system is postponed yet again.

Stay tuned here for Ken's continuing Earth and Planetary science and human spaceflight news.

Ken Kremer

This global mosaic view of Pluto was created from the latest high-resolution images to be downlinked from NASA's New Horizons spacecraft and released on Sept. 11, 2015.   The images were taken as New Horizons flew past Pluto on July 14, 2015, from a distance of 50,000 miles (80,000 kilometers).  This mosaic was stitched from over two dozen raw images captured by the LORRI imager and colorized.  Right side mosaic comprises twelve highest resolution views of Tombaugh Regio heart shaped feature and shows objects as small as 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometers) in size.  Credits: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute/ Ken Kremer/kenkremer.com/Marco Di Lorenzo

This global mosaic view of Pluto was created from the latest high-resolution images to be downlinked from NASA's New Horizons spacecraft and released on Sept. 11, 2015. The images were taken as New Horizons flew past Pluto on July 14, 2015, from a distance of 50,000 miles (80,000 kilometers). This mosaic was stitched from over two dozen raw images captured by the LORRI imager and colorized. Right side mosaic comprises twelve highest resolution views of Tombaugh Regio heart shaped feature and shows objects as small as 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometers) in size. Credits: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute/ Ken Kremer/kenkremer.com/Marco Di Lorenzo