Sent from my iPad
Saturday, December 31, 2016
Thursday, December 29, 2016
Wednesday, December 28, 2016
USA HSF
32s
Bobby Martin @KeepShuttle
@realDonaldTrump ONLY TRUMP !!- MANNED OPS BACK ---"TRUMP BRINGS HSF BACK". X37C THE SOLUTION.Trump call Boeing!!
Embedded
Tuesday, December 27, 2016
Monday, December 26, 2016
X37C
Sent from my iPad
X37C
Well, after talking to Capitol Hill staffers, they too are suffering the same head issues I am. At least I'm in good company.
Rather than talk about what Congress will or will not pay for, let's review what Congress has done since 2010 on space funding.
Congress has, on its own and despite both opposition from the Administration and aggressive delaying tactics on the SLS and Orion programs from NASA, appropriated those amounts needed to keep both Orion and SLS on track. And just as it's done since 2010, Congress is going to do what it wants on HSF, which is fund Orion and SLS fully.
What Congress sees is not a justification for Commercial Crew. Far from it. Congressional staffers are well aware of the true progress of that program and no, none of those players are getting us to ISS anytime soon. That's largely NASA's fault since Congress has informed it that the CCP program needed to down-selected years ago to better focus limited resources for faster progress. But NASA's leadership didn't do that for political reasons. Loose Boeing and CCP looses luster and respectability. Loose Sierra Nevada and we working on three capsule programs. And if you want to make engineers working in GN&C or ELSS laugh, tell them that one of the CCP companies will be flying crews by 2016. Guffaws galore.
And those in Congress specializing in space are well aware that, had getting independent access to ISS for our nation really been Job #1 for NASA's leadership, then the Administration would have approved Boeing's proposal for the X-37B follow-on, the 5 crew X-37C. We are talking about a dependable spacecraft that can sit in orbit for over a year and NASA said no to making it a crewed vehicle. Why?
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/03/x-37b-expanded-capabilities-iss-missions/
What Congress does see is that if we had not gone through the nonsense of 2010, we would be much closer to our own capability to launch crews to ISS than we are today. Instead, Neil Armstrong was right–the Administration changed our nation's HSF course in secret, without consultation, and mucked things up.
When it comes to the Moon, Congress is funding $3.5B annually on the DDTE for Orion and SLS. Anything else will have to wait for a new Administration as there is zero trust right now in Congress of anything the White House or NASA HQ are selling about human spaceflight.
Sent from my iPad
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Fwd: : An Era ends
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kent Castle <kent.d.castle@hotmail.com>
Date: December 24, 2016 at 6:19:25 PM CST
To: Choban Peter <peter.s.choban@aero.org>, Bogan Carole <bcbogan@earthlink.net>, Tetzloff Connie <owari567@comcast.net>, Grant Berl <berlgrant@frontier.com>, Bentz Jerry <bentz@sbcglobal.net>, Smith Harold <ke5gsk@gmail.com>, Reason Marilou <loganlou55@yahoo.com>, Martin Bobby <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>, Leach Larry <ljleach@tds.net>
Subject: Fw: : An Era ends
From:To:
Subject: Fw: : An Era ends
--- On Mon, 4/23/12, Margaret Chokas <hrh.madge@gmail.com> wrote:
Friday, December 23, 2016
Replacing shuttle
And those in Congress specializing in space are well aware that, had getting independent access to ISS for our nation really been Job #1 for NASA's leadership, then the Administration would have approved Boeing's proposal for the X-37B follow-on, the 5 crew X-37C. We are talking about a dependable spacecraft that can sit in orbit for over a year and NASA said no to making it a crewed vehicle. Why?
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/03/x-37b-expanded-capabilities-iss-missions/
Sent from my iPad
Thursday, December 22, 2016
Wednesday, December 21, 2016
Operational shuttle
Tuesday, December 20, 2016
X37C
Monday, December 19, 2016
Fwd: This Week in The Space Review - 2016 December 19
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jeff Foust <jeff@thespacereview.com>
Date: December 19, 2016 at 4:14:58 PM CST
To: <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>
Subject: This Week in The Space Review - 2016 December 19
Reply-To: Jeff Foust <jeff@thespacereview.com>
This Week in The Space Review - 2016 December 19
This Week in The Space Review
View this email in your browser
This Week in The Space Review
December 19, 2016
Welcome to The Space Review's weekly newsletter!
Concerns about growing anti-satellite capabilities of countries like China and Russia have led some to suggest the US step up its offensive space capabilities. Edward Ferguson and John Klein make the case that a more defensive stance to those threats will be more effective in the long run.
The future of war in space is defensive
Dagger of the mind
In the 1960s, President Johnson received intelligence briefings about the development of what would be known as the N-1 rocket, but what did he actually see? Charles Vick and Dwayne Day discuss declassified images of the N-1 as presented in those briefings.
America's future in LEO? The possibilities and challenges facing commercial space stations (part 2)
In the conclusion of an examination of the future of America's presence in low Earth orbit, Cody Knipfer explores some of the initiatives NASA has underway to potentially add commercial modules to the ISS, and the need for a plan to transition from the ISS to commercial space stations.
Will 2017 finally be the year of the small launcher?
Several companies continue to make progress on small launch vehicles even as other suffer setbacks. Jeff Foust examines whether the next year will see some of those efforts finally take flight, and whether smallsat developers are interested in using them.
Are lunar fuel depots needed for Mars missions?
The incoming administration may be interested in redirecting NASA back to the Moon, arguably to develop infrastructure needed for future Mars missions. Chris Carberry and Rick Zucker argue that such an approach would only delay, not support, the goal of sending humans to Mars.
Review: Earth in Human Hands
Human activity is changing the Earth, even if those changes were not the intent of that activity. Jeff Foust reviews a book by a planetary scientist and astrobiologist who examines the need to make deliberate changes to Earth to offset the damage, drawing in part upon our knowledge drawn from studies of our solar system.
Editor's Note: The Space Review will not publish the week of December 26. The next issue will be Tuesday, January 3, 2017. Happy Holidays!
We appreciate any feedback you may have about these articles as well as any other questions, comments, or suggestions about The Space Review. We're also actively soliciting articles to publish in future issues, so if you have an article or article idea that you think would be of interest, please email me.
Until next week,
Jeff Foust
Editor, The Space Review
jeff@thespacereview.com
Copyright © 2016 The Space Review, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you previously signed up to receive these weekly newsletters from The Space Review.
Our mailing address is:
unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences
Hubble "Cranes" in for a Closer Look at a Galaxy | NASA
https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/goddard/2016/hubble-cranes-in-for-a-closer-look-at-a-galaxy
Sent from my iPad
Sunday, December 18, 2016
KEEP SHUTTLE
Saturday, December 17, 2016
Glenn told obama to keep Shuttle
Sent from my iPad
Friday, December 16, 2016
26 Cosmic Photos from the Hubble Space Telescope's Ultra Deep Field
http://www.space.com/34171-hubble-telescope-ultra-deep-field-photos.html?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=socialfbspc&cmpid=social_spc_514630
Sent from my iPad
State of USA space program
Thursday, December 15, 2016
Congress, Don’t Make Us Hitch Rides With Russia. Love, NASA | WIRED
https://www.wired.com/2015/08/congress-dont-make-us-hitch-rides-russia-love-nasa/?mbid=social_twitter
Sent from my iPad
A Tragedy-- at the mercy of Russia!
WHAT A JOKE!!!! We just threw Billions into the trash!!!!
Now the media says NASA at mercy of Russia to get to iss, Well, Well, bolden knew this PLUS about fifty experts including Glenn, Kraft, ABBEY, Armstrong .glenn told O to keep them flying, O needed the money for illegal Muslims , told Glenn we can't afford them!!!
Sent from my iPad
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
WE are paying Russia for what WE HAD & THREW AWAY!!! SO O could Help M
NASA confirmed on Monday that a planned commercial crew program that SpaceX and Boeing were working on has suffered delays, and won't launch until 2018 at the earliest. This is a real problem for NASA, because without this program, the agency has to rely on Russian rocket launches to get American astronauts to the International Space Station — and it hasn't bought enough tickets.
Sent from my iPad
SpaceX and Boeing's Commerical Crew Failure Puts NASA at Russia's Mercy | Inverse
https://www.inverse.com/article/25129-spacex-boeing-nasa-commercial-crew-delay-russia
Sent from my iPad
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
Monday, December 12, 2016
Fwd: This Week in The Space Review - 2016 December 12
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jeff Foust <jeff@thespacereview.com>
Date: December 12, 2016 at 6:23:51 PM CST
To: <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>
Subject: This Week in The Space Review - 2016 December 12
Reply-To: Jeff Foust <jeff@thespacereview.com>
This Week in The Space Review - 2016 December 12
This Week in The Space Review
View this email in your browser
This Week in The Space Review
December 12, 2016
Welcome to The Space Review's weekly newsletter!
While all the ISS partners have now agreed to extend operations of the station through at least 2024, the station's life is finite. In the first of a two-part essay, Cody Knipfer examines some of the issues associated with the future of the ISS and potential commercial successors.
America's future in LEO? The possibilities and challenges facing commercial space stations (part 1)
AIM misses the funding target, for now
At a meeting of ministers of its member nations earlier this month, ESA got most of what it asked for, with the exception of funding for an asteroid mission called AIM. Jeff Foust recounts what happened to AIM and why ESA's leader is not yet giving up on the mission.
For planetary scientists, Venus is hot again
As various space agencies make plans for missions to the Moon, Mars, and outer solar system, Venus—once considered Earth's twin—looks neglected by comparison. Jeff Foust reports on how there's increased enthusiasm for more missions to Venus, including decisions that could be made within weeks.
A Trump Administration path to advance commercial space solar power
Should space-based solar power be part of the Trump Administration's space strategy? Mike Snead makes the argument that it's essential for the next administration to start work on a technology that can assure long-term energy independence.
Review: The Glass Universe
Long before rocket girls were calculating hidden figures for NASA, women were supporting the research of astronomers at Harvard Observatory. Jeff Foust reviews a book that brings new light to that work as both the field of astronomy, and women's roles in it, evolved at the turn of the 20th century.
We appreciate any feedback you may have about these articles as well as any other questions, comments, or suggestions about The Space Review. We're also actively soliciting articles to publish in future issues, so if you have an article or article idea that you think would be of interest, please email me.
Until next week,
Jeff Foust
Editor, The Space Review
jeff@thespacereview.com
Copyright © 2016 The Space Review, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you previously signed up to receive these weekly newsletters from The Space Review.
Our mailing address is:
unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences