Friday, August 23, 2019

Why no X37C?

Why?


And those in Congress specializing in space are well aware that, had getting independent access to ISS for our nation really been Job #1 for NASA's leadership, then the Administration would have approved Boeing's proposal for the X-37B follow-on, the 5 crew X-37C. We are talking about a dependable spacecraft that can sit in orbit for over a year and NASA said no to making it a crewed vehicle. Why?

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/03/x-37b-expanded-capabilities-iss-missions/



Jim Hillhouse 
Sent from my iPad

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

EO Capability is more important than moon/Mars


Our leaders need to recognize the importance of EO Operations & the need for Shuttle like Capability as Aldrin & Abbey plus many others have. This capability needs to be operational. Re X37C Boeing proposal

Moon /Mars exploration are not as critical as EO capabilities.





Sent from my iPad

Monday, August 19, 2019

Fwd: This Week in The Space Review - 2019 August 19



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: Jeff Foust <jeff@thespacereview.com>
Date: August 19, 2019 at 5:59:56 PM CDT
To: <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>
Subject: This Week in The Space Review - 2019 August 19
Reply-To: Jeff Foust <jeff@thespacereview.com>

This Week in The Space Review - 2019 August 19
This Week in The Space Review
View this email in your browser

This Week in The Space Review

August 19, 2019

Welcome to The Space Review's weekly newsletter!

Turning a corner on Mars

For decades, scientists have sought to bring back samples from Mars for study in terrestrial labs. Van Kane and Pat Nealon describe how those efforts are now picking up momentum with a series of missions that could return Martian samples within a little more than a decade.
 

Macron's Space Force: Why now?

Last month, French government officials, including President Emmanuel Macron, outlined plans to take a more active military space role, including its own space force. Taylor Dinerman examines why France is taking the lead on such efforts among its European allies.
 

An "operationally ready" spaceport

Virgin Galactic took another step closer to commercial operations last week not with another test flight of SpaceShipTwo but instead updates to Spaceport America in New Mexico. Jeff Foust reports on the significance of what might seem to be a trivial milestone.
 

The future of commercial space transportation

Today, the term "commercial space transportation" usually refers to rockets for placing payloads into orbit. Dallas Bienhoff describes how that will soon expand to in-space transportation services, either in orbit around the Earth or for missions to the Moon.
 

Review: Heroes of the Space Age

As the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11 fades, so does the generation that made that mission possible. Jeff Foust reviews a book that profiles some of the "heroes" of the early years of human spaceflight.

 
We appreciate any feedback you may have about these articles as well as any other questions, comments, or suggestions about The Space Review. We're also actively soliciting articles to publish in future issues, so if you have an article or article idea that you think would be of interest, please email me.

Until next week,

Jeff Foust
Editor, The Space Review
jeff@thespacereview.com
Copyright © 2019 The Space Review, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you previously signed up to receive these weekly newsletters from The Space Review.

Our mailing address is:
The Space Review
12205 Village Square Ter
Suite 101
Rockville, MD 20852

Add us to your address book


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences 

Sunday, August 18, 2019

Need X37C to replace shuttle capability — read Lost in Space by abbey

America is not building a second-generation space shuttle but is instead building three space capsules: the Orion and two others, from Boeing and SpaceX. All will land by parachute, like spacecraft of the 1960s, and none will allow space walks comparable to the space shuttle. Unlike Hubble, the next big telescope, the James Webb Space Telescope (due for launch October 2018) will have to be right the first time. There will be no way to repair it. It is already more costly than originally planned, and there is no shuttle to take astronauts to save it if something goes wrong. 

The U.S. Air Force's Boeing X-37B, which began as a NASA craft but was transferred to the Pentagon in 2004, is an unmanned space plane that looks like a small space shuttle. Like the shuttle, it returns to Earth and lands on a runway. It has been flying successfully for five years. A scaled-up version with an astronaut crew to work outside the vehicle could reestablish America's ability to build and maintain big structures in Earth orbit.


Sent from my iPad

Saturday, August 3, 2019

Shuttle capability

Everbody told , DON'T RETIRE until replacement available, but the liberals & some rino's are not interested in the USA being a leading space faring Nation as illustrated by the fact they will not implement the Boeing X37C proposal-- A Shuttle Replacement! Our on- Orbit capabilities are declining, for which we will pay a heavy price!

The shuttle retired in 2011 & by 2017 the inferior capsules were to be flying, has not occurred yet. Meanwhile, we pay Russia & capabilities continue to decline! And nasa would not approve X37C, a shuttle replacement!





Sent from my iPad

Friday, August 2, 2019

Shuttle capability

George abbey
The U.S. Air Force's Boeing X-37B, which began as a NASA craft but was transferred to the Pentagon in 2004, is an unmanned space plane that looks like a small space shuttle. Like the shuttle, it returns to Earth and lands on a runway. It has been flying successfully for five years. A scaled-up version with an astronaut crew to work outside the vehicle could reestablish America's ability to build and maintain big structures in Earth orbit.
from Lost in Space , Washington Examiner.

Jim Hillhouse

And those in Congress specializing in space are well aware that, had getting independent access to ISS for our nation really been Job #1 for NASA's leadership, then the Administration would have approved Boeing's proposal for the X-37B follow-on, the 5 crew X-37C. We are talking about a dependable spacecraft that can sit in orbit for over a year and NASA said no to making it a crewed vehicle. Why?

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/…/x-37b-expanded-capabiliti…/


Sent from my iPad